These are the official scores for the first ACM selection contest of Fall 1997 (Deep Fathom Five). The next one will be on Saturday 18 October. (There will be a practice contest to familiarize people with the environment at 10:30 and a real contest starting between 12:00 and 13:00, which will run for three hours.) If you were in the contest and would like copies of the code that you wrote, please send email to acm00@plg. Test data/output and HTML versions of the questions are available at http://plg.uwaterloo.ca/~acm00/ Here are the official scores for everyone with at least one problem solved (seven people failed to solve any of the problems). (People are ranked first by the number of questions solved, then by decreasing time penaltly. The time penalty for a question that you solve is the number of minutes it takes to produce a correct solution plus an additional 20 minutes for every incorrect submission made.) +------+-------------------------+---------------------+------+ |userid| Team Name | 1 2 3 4 5 | Total| +------+-------------------------+---------------------+------+ |acm008|Derek Kisman (1997) | 52 216 186 22 |4 476| |acm030|David Kennedy | 111 113 43 |3 267| |acm015|Jeff Shute | 59 197 80 |3 336| |acm020|Viet-Trung Luu (1997) | 82 40 |2 122| |acm018|Wai Min Yee (1997) | 160 67 |2 227| |acm011|Sun, Pin Fei | 153 95 |2 248| |acm019|Viet-Tam Luu | 192 65 |2 257| |acm021|Nikita Borisov (1995) | 237 43 |2 280| |acm007|Wing Hong Ho | 282 201 |2 483| |acm003|Soroosh Yazdani | 71 |1 71| |acm016|Jason Thomas | 71 |1 71| |acm017|Drew Hamilton | 79 |1 79| |acm001|Joel Kamnitzer | 128 |1 128| |acm026|Sabin Cautis | 134 |1 134| |acm009|Jason Wong | 159 |1 159| |acm013|Ahilan Sinnarajah | 297 |1 297| |acm010|Ian Prest | 326 |1 326| +------+-------------------------+---------------------+------+ The years indicate when participants have previously gone to the finals. U of T held a contest at the same time with four of the questions the same. Their question 5 was similar to the anagram problem on the contest posters. (Next contest we should have identical problem sets.) Here are the UofT results (22 people competed): Overall Rankings Rank Num Probs Pnlty Prob 1 Prob 2 Prob 3 Prob 4 Prob 5 ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 20 3 298 0/00:00 1/01:55 0/00:00 1/01:31 2/01:11 2 4 3 556 3/02:55 0/00:00 0/00:00 1/01:46 3/03:14 3 1 2 147 1/00:44 0/00:00 0/00:00 1/01:42 1/00:00 4 8 2 232 1/00:00 3/02:20 0/00:00 1/00:52 0/00:00 5 13 2 265 1/01:56 1/02:28 0/00:00 2/00:00 2/00:00 6 3 2 322 0/00:00 0/00:00 2/00:00 2/01:52 3/02:29 7 16 2 345 0/00:00 1/01:59 0/00:00 3/03:05 1/00:00 8 10 1 65 0/00:00 2/00:00 0/00:00 1/01:05 0/00:00 9 12 1 122 0/00:00 1/00:00 0/00:00 1/02:02 3/00:00 10 17 1 129 0/00:00 1/02:09 0/00:00 3/00:00 1/00:00 11 9 1 164 0/00:00 4/00:00 0/00:00 3/02:04 0/00:00 12 21 1 168 0/00:00 1/00:00 0/00:00 1/02:48 0/00:00 Key: #attempts/elapsed time HH:MM until solved Due to technical difficulties their contest was extended by 20 minutes ... we had several correct submissions 20 minutes before any of the U of T had correct submissions. Note that the technical difficulties could have increased U of T's penalty times considerably.